Smartick Try it for free! Abrir el Menú Móvil Try it for free!
Accelerate your child’s learning
Smartick is a fun way to learn math!

Dec11

Measurements of Time: Biennium, Lustrum, Decade, Century, Millenium

In this post we’re going to look at measurements of time that refer to quantities of years: biennium, lustrum, decade, century, millenium

If you want to review previous posts on units of time, you can do so here:

Before you read on, the most important thing you need to understand is the following:

century

We’re going to practice these concepts using a few problems that you can find during your daily Smartick sessions. Let’s start!

Problem 1

century

To solve this problem, we have to remember that a century is 100 years, therefore 4 centuries are 4×100=400 years.

Knowing this, we just have to add these 400 years to the year in which the bottle was made, 2009.

Therefore 2009 + 400 = 2409

Answer: The bottle’s lifespan will end in 2409

Problem 2

century

To solve this problem, we need to subtract the dates.

2002 – 1997 = 5

The unit of time equivalent to 5 years is a lustrum.

Answer: A lustrum passed between both trips

Problem 3

century

The first thing we need to do to solve this problem is calculate the number of years that pass between 3655 B.C. and 2010.

To do this, we add 3655 and 2010. 3655 + 2010 = 5665

Now we need to break this length of time down into smaller units.

5000 years is 5 millennia

600 years is 6 centuries

60 years is 6 decades

5 years is a lustrum

Therefore, 5 millennia + 6 centuries + 6 decades + one lustrum

Answer: 5 millennia, 6 centuries, 6 decades and one lustrum had passed

Problem 4

century

To solve this problem, first we need to take into account that the rock is now 1/4 of its original size, which means that it has lost 3/4 of its size.

If 13 lustra pass for every quarter, we need to multiply this amount by 3. 3 x 13 = 39 lustra

Now we just need to multiply the 39 lustra by the 5 years that each lustrum contains:

39 x 5 = 195

Answer: It has been exposed to 195 years of erosion

I hope these exercises have helped you understand larger units of time. Remember, if you want to practice more of these problems and many others like how to calculate lcm, register with Smartick and do your session every day.

Learn More:

Fun is our brain’s favorite way of learning
Diane Ackerman
Smartick is a fun way to learn math
  • 15 fun minutes a day
  • Adapts to your child’s level
  • Millions of students since 2009
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Smartick

Add a new public comment to the blog:

The comments that you write here are moderated and can be seen by other users.
For private inquiries please write to [email protected]

Your personal details will not be shown publicly.

I have read and accepted the Privacy and Cookies Policy

13 Comments

  • JosephApr 18 2024, 9:40 AM

    good to learn

    Reply
  • PhutiFeb 22 2024, 2:12 PM

    I am here to learn

    Reply
    • Tiffany KnightSep 07 2024, 3:46 AM

      Love it!

      Reply
  • TemilolaJun 12 2023, 5:02 PM

    I love this lesson tell me more about it

    Reply
    • SmartickJun 16 2023, 6:18 AM

      Hi Temilola,

      Thank you very much for your comment.
      If you want to learn more content like this and practice elementary school math, just sign up at Smartick. You have a free trial period with no strings attached.
      If you have any additional questions or doubts you can write to my colleagues of the pedagogical team at [email protected].

      Best regards!

      Reply
  • Brian MasonNov 14 2022, 12:31 PM

    Because there is no year 0 in the Gregorian calendar (the calendar used in most parts of the world), the number of years separating 3655 BC and 2010 AD is NOT 2010 – (-3655) = 2010 + 3655 = 5665 years but rather 5665 – 1 = 5664 years.
    To see this quickly, it may help to realize that without a year 0, any date (for instance, January 24) of the year 1 BC is one year, NOT 1 – (-1) = 2 years, prior to the same date of the year 1 AD.
    It seems people like to place the blame for the omission of a year 0 on Bede, an English monk, who was one of the greatest scholars of the Early Middle Ages. IMHO, this is hardly fair, especially since the first use of the number zero did not take place in England until the year 1598, some 863 years after Bede’s death.

    Reply
  • Judith smytheOct 11 2022, 12:39 PM

    Hi

    Reply
  • sophie flynnDec 15 2021, 4:20 AM

    Hi, I love this page it is amazing and really helpful for my students.

    Reply
  • Victor SundayNov 01 2020, 3:10 PM

    This is so helpful and educative. Thanks for the thought!

    Reply
  • VictorhoiffOct 25 2020, 9:20 PM

    Thanks

    Reply
  • guyMay 04 2020, 11:34 AM

    very helpful

    Reply
  • MTONGA RAJAB JOSEPHApr 29 2020, 9:01 AM

    VERY HELPFUL AND EDUCATIVE. INDEED

    Reply
  • MikeOct 23 2018, 11:30 AM

    COOL!!!!!!

    Reply